The pension reforms passed in June, paring back the benefits for new teachers and administrators, will knock off $189 million per twelvemonth from the boosted payments taxpayers must make to go on the California State Teachers' Retirement System solvent over the adjacent 30 years.

The market value of CalSTRS' assets remain below the high in 2007. Retirement benefits for members assume a rate of return on CalSTRS' investments of 7.5 percent annually. Because it has fallen behind, the unfunded liability, required to keep the system solvent for the next 30 years, is $65 billion.

The market value of CalSTRS' assets remains below the high in 2007. Retirement benefits for members assume a rate of return on CalSTRS' investments of 7.5 percent annually. Considering the defined benefit plan has fallen behind, without growth from compounded interest, the unfunded liability – required to continue the system solvent for the next 30 years – is now $65 billion. (Click to enlarge).

That's the proficient news. The bad news is that this represents only about half dozen percentage of the extra $3.25 billion annually that CalSTRS actuaries are proverb is needed to erase the system's current $65 billion unfunded liability. That liability is the debt that taxpayers owe to time to come pensioners to compensate for shortfalls in CalSTRS' income on investments post-obit the Wall Street implosion in 2008. CalSTRS is still recovering from that with $152 billion in avails in July, still $twenty billion below a high of $172 billion in 2007.

The Legislature hasn't yet started paying down that liability, and information technology isn't expected to until 2022 at the earliest, given the precarious state of the budget. But when it does start making a dent in the $65 billion, it will be diverting money that otherwise could go to restore funding for M-12 and community college programs.

Legislators had only a crude guess of the financial impact of the pension reforms they passed in the terminal solar day of the session last calendar month. The deal that legislative leaders and Gov. Jerry Brown cut didn't get out enough time for the state'due south two largest pension arrangement – CalSTRS and CalPERS, the California Public Employee Retirement System – to practice the math in time; they barely knew what was in it.

CalSTRS completed its analysis last week. It showed that the changes, in lowered benefits and higher employee contributions, will ease the pressure level on the system. But it will have decades for the full bear upon to take effect, because the reforms will utilise only to employees hired later on Jan. 1, 2013. Courts have ruled that pension benefits for public employees are a vested right that can't be undone unless employees are given something of comparable value in render, like a heighten. Legislative leaders and Brown didn't claiming that supposition in coming upwards with a pension deal.

Through concerted effort and rising values on Wall Street, CalSTRS' defined benefit program became more than fully funded by 2000. A combination of new benefits followed by a plunge in investment values in 2007-08 has left it only about 70 percent funded; anything below 80 percent is a serious problem. Source: 2022 Actuarial Evaluation by the firm Milliman for CalSTRS. (Click to enlarge)

Through concerted effort and rising values on Wall Street, CalSTRS' defined benefit program became more than fully funded by 2000. A combination of new benefits followed past a plunge in investment values in 2007-08 has left information technology only well-nigh seventy percent funded; annihilation below 80 pct is a serious problem. Source: 2022 Actuarial Evaluation by the business firm Milliman for CalSTRS. (Click to enlarge)

The CalSTRS analysis concluded that CalSTRS will salvage $22.7 billion over the next 30 years (about $12 billion if adjusted for inflation) through paying out lower benefits, though most of the savings volition years from now when new employees retire.

Almost of that volition be achieved past raising the retirement age by two years for the same level of benefits. CalSTRS' 430,000 active members are currently retiring on average at age 62, with 25 years of experience, for which they're entitled to receive a benefit equal to 56 percent of their highest-year salary, most $4,000 a month on boilerplate. Time to come employees who retire at the same historic period volition get half dozen percentage points less: 50 percent of the average salary.

The reforms also restrict double-dipping (turning around and returning to piece of work every bit a teacher or primary after retiring), and they ban pension spiking (getting a large enhance in the concluding yr of work to build upward a big pension). Pensions will be determined on the average of iii sequent years of the highest pay, non the concluding year. And there volition be an inflation-adjusted maximum income – $136,440 in 2022 – on which pensions will be based; those who earn more that – superintendents, some administrators, and principals in a few districts – won't become a higher pension. CalSTRS says that provision will touch on only 3,400 employees, less than one pct of active members.

Teachers and administrators, their school districts, and the state (through the General Fund) pay into CalSTRS. The combined contribution rate is currently eighteen.51 percent of each employee's pay, with the employee contributing 8 percent, the district paying 8.25 pct, and the state paying 2.26 percentage. The reduced payout in benefits will eventually reduce the "normal" costs to fifteen.nine percent of payroll, with the savings going to the state and districts (how the savings will be divide betwixt the ii isn't articulate under the new law). Employees will continue to contribute 8 per centum of their pay into CalSTRS.

Last Apr, actuaries estimated that paying off CalSTRS' $65 billion in unfunded liability would require raising the level of contribution an boosted 12.9 percentage points, to nearly a 3rd of an employee's pay. That would require $3.25 billion more from the Full general Fund for CalSTRS alone. Every bit a result of the passage of AB 430, the alimony reform bill, the reduced benefits will offset iii-quarters of 1 percentage point of the increase: $188.5 million less from taxpayers.

Common cold comfort, perhaps, but all the same a savings.

To get more reports like this ane, click here to sign upward for EdSource'southward no-cost daily email on latest developments in educational activity.